This says that "people who live with high levels of motor traffic are far more likely to be socially disconnected and even ill than people who live in quiet, clean streets."
I suggest reading Joshua's own blog entry, or the report itself published on the living streets website.
The noise of motor traffic can be reduced in many ways. Quieter road surfaces can be used, speed limits can be lowered, and of course you can reduce the amount of driving by increasing the amount of cycling. This requires that cycling is made into a pleasant way to making people's journeys so that they will opt for it themselves.
People on busy streets who "largely lived in the back rooms of their houses and chose dark or black curtains to conceal the soot build-up from vehicles" are living on streets which are also hostile to cyclists.
The Dutch solution
The houses are behind a layer of trees as well as a noise barrier. So, walking from the houses through the barrier you will successively see these three scenes.
The road behind the barrier has a 70 km/h (43 mph) speed limit despite being a dual carriageway. It also uses a quiet road surface. Cyclists and pedestrians have other routes so that they do not have to share this road, nor be inconvenienced by having to stop at the traffic lights.
People live in houses here with exactly the sort of social interaction described for "Light street" in the paper.
There is also another view of the same barriers, including video.







1 comment:
I remember going to Germany and wondering why the flip we never had these at home. I still don't get it.
Post a Comment