I recently noticed that a bumpy spot on a cycle path and a rough path on a road nearby had both been marked for repair. Both marks appeared on the same day, and were in the same style, so presumably they were to be addressed at the same time.
On the left is the road and on the right is the cycle path.
A few days later, this is the situation.
And finally here it is after the work has been completed. In both cases, the surface is back to being completely smooth.
Now here's the point of this blog. Cycle paths and roads are treated equivalently. Both are maintained to a high standard, by the same people, with the same equipment. Both repairs come out of the maintenance budget. Cycle path repairs don't come out of the "cycling budget", which is around 30 euros per person per year and spent on new infrastructure, not fixing the old.
This is all a world away from the situation I was used to in the UK, where in fact it's quite likely that this level of damage to the surface would not have been considered to be enough to warrant repair in the first place.
The photo of the machinery and workmen was taken in the same place at the same time as the middle photos were taken.
The difference between walking and cycling safety
19 hours ago