This video, from the fietsberaad, isn't too clear, but what it shows is quite interesting. It's an experiment with dynamic cycle path lighting. The lights remain at about 20% brightness until a cyclist approaches, when they will increase to full brightness as the cyclist passes, reducing again over several minutes if there are no more cyclists nearby.
The idea is to retain a high level of social safety along cycle paths while also reducing the energy usage and light pollution which would result from full brightness lights at all times.
These experiments do, of course, also use LED lighting to further reduce the energy demand, and they are soon to appear more commonly across the country.
There are further stories about lighting, which include some other experimental schemes.
I wonder how it works... Does it use a thermal sensor (like the one used in alarm systems) to detect movement. Because I could imagine that my velomobile would not show up (or at least has a 'low thermal signature').
Btw. about 1,5 weeks ago I spent the weekend with my parents in Stadskanaal (The Netherlands) and they have a stretch of cyclepath with lights you can activate. This time there is no sensor, just a pole with a button on it. I haven't tried it, because it was light when I went there. But you can see it in the YouTube video in my blogpost (around 2:13).
Will these adjust to ambient light? Under a full or near full moon, especially with snow cover, or with cloudy skies and snow cover in urban areas, eyes can adjust and provide far more depth than any lighting.
(If anyone ever wants to see ridiculous over lighting, visit Prague during the winter... it almost hurts).
Anneke - Assen is planning to bring more light to a recreational area near water, in order to increase safety. So as not to disturb animal life, green LED lights have been tested on the many bats flying around there at night. It was a serious research project by Groningen University. Result: intense white light attracts bats, thus changing their natural behaviour. Green light and no light at all make no difference to the number of bats, that is the researchers counted the same number of bats in the dark and under green light. As the green light is also cheaper than bright white light, Assen will probably install the green lights. There is one detail I don't really understand: bats seem to be attracted to bright lights. In my opinion they should be, as bright lights primarily attract their prey (moths and all that), so following their prey seems to me utterly normal natural behaviour. But the ecologists will no doubt argue that it is in the bats' best interest not to offer them a concentration of tasty insects.
@ Frits, I happen to know why the lights attract insects, they navigate by the light of the moon, (or sun, depending on what insects)at leats moths, bees, flies etc do. So, bright lights are like a moon to them. Their eyes can detect the angle of the light, and with something as far away as the moon, they can safely navigate. Artificial lights however make them go around in circles till they reach the light, at which point they can no longer navigate at all. Bats have sonar (or whatever the word is in English) so they can always find insects simply by listening. And sure, the insects won't hang around a lightbulb waiting to be eaten, but that won't starve the bats.
Anyway, there are other nocturnal animals that benefit from the green light, right? Owls for example, and badgers etc.
Reducing the light overall is a very good thing. And it's not just nocturnal animals that are affected - not sure how green fairs with Astronomers. I know the current lights are particularly bad for astronomy.
@Anneke: this is turning into a biology lesson :-). True, insects use the sun and the moon as orientation. Owls, and badgers for that matter, are almost colour blind as are most animals except monkeys and apes. Green light to them only means that it is a bit darker outside which for badgers makes no difference as they are so shortsighted that even by daylight they mostly go by their smell and hearing. Owls on the other hand have eyes that are so light sensitive that green light to them is almost as clear as white light is to us; but the species living in our neighbourhood mostly catch their prey by sound. Dogs and cats ditto; dogs are in the badger category, cats more like owls. So essentially, the choice for green lighting is very human-centred. Green light looks good to us; most animals couldn't care less. But as it's alo cheaper in use I'm all for it.
If you like this blog please support us so that it can continue. We're are not supported by grants and we do not ask for charity. We sell quality bicycle components and organize cycling holidays:
The next open study tour is in August 2013. Book a place in order to experience for yourself how policy and infrastructure in Assen and Groningen have led to the high cycling modal share in this area.:
The positive stuff Three types of safety - As well as preventing injuries and death, high quality cycling infrastructure addresses both subjective safety and social safety which are of vital importance in encouraging people to cycle. Dutch Safety Figures - Cyclists in the Netherlands are the safest in the world, but it has little if anything to do with "safety in numbers". Sustainable safety - the principles which have lead to Dutch roads, streets and cycle-paths being safe. A million per hour - The scale of cycling in the Netherlands is enormous. Dutch people make more cycle journeys each day than the entire English speaking world put together. Campaigning - a collection of posts about how to campaign for more cycling, including reference to "Stop the child murder", a successful campaign from the 1970s. What Works - examples of policy, infrastructure and campaigning which have made a different in the Netherlands. Superhighways - "Cycling superhighways" are not a new idea in the Netherlands Cycle Paths - Well designed cycle paths benefit all cyclists, regardless of experience or speed Segregation without cycle paths - you don't always need a cycle path to keep cyclists safe from motorists Unravelling of routes is vitally important History - how the Netherlands got to where it is now. See especially "Stop the child murder" Before and After - views of places before and after they have been transformed for cycling Directness - examples of prioritising cycling Traffic Lights - examples of how cyclists can be prioritised and kept safe at traffic light junctions. Note that it's almost always possible to turn right on a red light when cycling in the Netherlands. Roundabouts - roundabouts in the Netherlands have one very important feature to learn from: They keep cyclists away from motor vehicles. This is far more important than the differences in geometry vs. roundabouts in other countries. Exceptional infrastructure is always nice to see, but remember that a dense network of mundane routes is far more important to boost cycling modal share Gritting of cycle paths - dealing with snow and ice. Children - It may seem hackneyed, but children really are the future. If they can't cycle safely then where will future adult cyclists come from ? This is why children should be the primary focus of campaigners. Note also that according to UNICEF, Dutch children are the happiest in the world. School travel - Everyone knows that Dutch children cycle to school, but it's a surprise to many people that school trips are also usually by bike. Cycle Parking - including our favourite design of stand. Cycle Parking at railway stations, see in particular Groningen and Assen as each have multiple posts showing how the cycle parking has grown over time. Health effects of cycling Road Works - It's important that cyclists are thought of when there are road works. If the environment becomes hostile for cyclists then they may stop cycling and never start again. Commuting - Commuting cyclists are interesting, but they're not the only people who should ride bikes. Anatomy of a reliable everyday bicycle - the common features of bikes used by nearly every person every day in the Netherlands. Speed - Some people have the idea that Dutch cyclists are slow. This isn't true. It is just that in the Netherlands, everyone cycles, including the slow people. Fast cyclists are as fast as anywhere. These posts show people who ride faster than average, using the same infrastructure as those who ride slower.
This blog is free of charge to read and for most individual usage including reasonable "quoting" of its contents. However, neither the text nor the photos on this blog are in the public domain. To find out more, please read our copyright and licensing information.
Search
Non-sponsored links
Experience for yourself how policy and infrastructure in Assen and Groningen have led to the high cycling modal share in this area:
If you like this blog please support us so we can continue. We sell quality bicycle components and organize cycling holidays:
A cyclist in a cycling family living in the capital of the cycling province of the world's greatest cycling country.
I was born in the UK, lived for over 8 years in New Zealand and have lived in the Netherlands since 2007.
I organise cycling infrastructure study tours, run an online bicycle shop, arrange cycling holidays and write a popular blog about cycling.
My email address is avftcp@hembrow.eu
8 comments:
Interesting. We could do with some of that round here in 'lighttown', where there's altogether too much light blazing away.
Wasn't there a blog about green lights, which don't disturb nocturnal animals?
Anyway, good initiatives.
I wonder how it works... Does it use a thermal sensor (like the one used in alarm systems) to detect movement. Because I could imagine that my velomobile would not show up (or at least has a 'low thermal signature').
Btw. about 1,5 weeks ago I spent the weekend with my parents in Stadskanaal (The Netherlands) and they have a stretch of cyclepath with lights you can activate. This time there is no sensor, just a pole with a button on it. I haven't tried it, because it was light when I went there. But you can see it in the YouTube video in my blogpost (around 2:13).
Will these adjust to ambient light? Under a full or near full moon, especially with snow cover, or with cloudy skies and snow cover in urban areas, eyes can adjust and provide far more depth than any lighting.
(If anyone ever wants to see ridiculous over lighting, visit Prague during the winter... it almost hurts).
Anneke - Assen is planning to bring more light to a recreational area near water, in order to increase safety. So as not to disturb animal life, green LED lights have been tested on the many bats flying around there at night. It was a serious research project by Groningen University. Result: intense white light attracts bats, thus changing their natural behaviour. Green light and no light at all make no difference to the number of bats, that is the researchers counted the same number of bats in the dark and under green light. As the green light is also cheaper than bright white light, Assen will probably install the green lights.
There is one detail I don't really understand: bats seem to be attracted to bright lights. In my opinion they should be, as bright lights primarily attract their prey (moths and all that), so following their prey seems to me utterly normal natural behaviour. But the ecologists will no doubt argue that it is in the bats' best interest not to offer them a concentration of tasty insects.
@ Frits, I happen to know why the lights attract insects, they navigate by the light of the moon, (or sun, depending on what insects)at leats moths, bees, flies etc do. So, bright lights are like a moon to them. Their eyes can detect the angle of the light, and with something as far away as the moon, they can safely navigate. Artificial lights however make them go around in circles till they reach the light, at which point they can no longer navigate at all. Bats have sonar (or whatever the word is in English) so they can always find insects simply by listening. And sure, the insects won't hang around a lightbulb waiting to be eaten, but that won't starve the bats.
Anyway, there are other nocturnal animals that benefit from the green light, right? Owls for example, and badgers etc.
Reducing the light overall is a very good thing. And it's not just nocturnal animals that are affected - not sure how green fairs with Astronomers. I know the current lights are particularly bad for astronomy.
@Anneke: this is turning into a biology lesson :-). True, insects use the sun and the moon as orientation. Owls, and badgers for that matter, are almost colour blind as are most animals except monkeys and apes. Green light to them only means that it is a bit darker outside which for badgers makes no difference as they are so shortsighted that even by daylight they mostly go by their smell and hearing. Owls on the other hand have eyes that are so light sensitive that green light to them is almost as clear as white light is to us; but the species living in our neighbourhood mostly catch their prey by sound. Dogs and cats ditto; dogs are in the badger category, cats more like owls. So essentially, the choice for green lighting is very human-centred. Green light looks good to us; most animals couldn't care less. But as it's alo cheaper in use I'm all for it.
Post a Comment