Thursday, 16 December 2010

The Netherlands Cycling Embassy


Yesterday, 97 people attended a meeting hosted by the Fietsberaad about the possibility of the Netherlands having its own Cycling Embassy.

I felt quite honoured to have been invited, and I went along with little idea of what to expect. It's actually a very exciting proposal. For too long the Dutch have kept this secret to themselves - not because they've tried to be secretive, but because they've simply not promoted the wonderful things that have happened here. If all goes to plan, then in the future it will be easier to find information about what the Netherlands has done to achieve the extraordinary rate of cycling which the country has, with all of the benefits which go with it.

For me personally, it was also excellent to catch up with some of the other bloggers who I've only communicated with online. Marc, Mark (we first met and went on a bit of a tour of Utrecht, see video above), Marco and Henry.

Also I met several other people that I've been hoping to meet.

We had a series of excellent presentations, including from Lise Bjorg Pedersen from the Danish Cyclists Federation who originally came up with the idea of their Embassy. She was very supportive of the idea of the Netherlands doing more with their position as world leader in cycling.

Another presentation which I found particularly interesting was that by Roelof Wittink of the Interface for Cycling Expertise who have been doing similar work, mostly with developing nations, for over a decade. In particular, some numbers from his presentation grabbed my attention. Globally, no less than 6 trillion US dollars per year are spent on transport. Of this, 2 trillion are spent by developing nations. Of this, 90% is spent on land transport, and 80% is spent on new roads. Even in places where car ownership is still under 10% of the population, many of these countries are already suffering extreme congestion. It clearly is not a sustainable path, and the I-CE would like to see it reduce to 50% of the expenditure to increase support for sustainable urban transport. That's one of the reasons why the I-CE is so important. With their help, India, for instance, is trying to avoid the problems it could otherwise end up with.

I'm also keeping my eyes on the initiative in the UK to set up an "embassy". It's long been a hope of mine to help to ferment change in the UK, and for Britain to regain the cycling culture that it lost.

Somehow a collective memory has been lost. Many British people don't realise that even within their own lifetime, before motoring took over from everything else, people didn't make excuses about hills and the weather. Rather, it was normal for British people to cycle virtually as much as the Danes and Dutch do now:In many places where it has currently nearly disappeared from everyday life, cycling could come back. It merely needs support. That is what the idea of the Embassy is all about - to supply support, along with the best example in the world of how to achieve a high cycling rate. Together we can work to overcome the domination of motor vehicles.

That's what this blog, and the study tours which we started the blog to support, are about.

17 reacties:

r s thompson said...

"In many places where it has currently nearly disappeared from everyday life, cycling could come back. It merely needs support. "

perhaps. in many cycling situatations i expect that moving by bicycle is somewhere around 3 to 5 times faster?? than walking...and properly equipped a bike can carry goods easier.

if hundreds of more trips were by bicycle with the proper infrastrucutre this could take pressure off the auto roads to a noticable degree...especially in denser sections of municipalities (referring to the us).

it looks as if the dutch have created a good mix of transport with the extensive bicycle infrastructure, cycle priority at intersections and mass transit options. this seems to add a nice character to their towns and cities.

examinedspoke said...

An embassy is long overdue. The Netherlands is the pre-eminent cycling country in the world, but has been overshadowed in recent years (perhaps) because of limited marketing.

Mark said...

"this seems to add nice character to their towns and cities"?
It is 'slightly' more than that!
It is a way of life that gives the Dutch more quiet and more pleasant livable cities, a healthier people and many, many more advantages. It is time we get the Netherlands Cycling Embassy to get this message out better!

It was very nice to meet you David! And the video is not too bad ;-)

kfg said...

"where car ownership is still under 10% of the population, many of these countries are already suffering extreme congestion."

Congestion defines the limit of the road and the relationship is not commutative.

Barring some countervailing force to limit the number of cars on a road it will fill up until the level of congestion reaches whatever level it is that people will tolerate; and they have been found to tolerate gridlock, at least for a time.

Thus doubling the capacity of the road often only accomplishes having twice as many cars gridlocked.

How does this initiative go about transmitting this idea to developing nations?

Anonymous said...

Great news!

Congratulations to all involved - you will (and currently do, I should say) make superb cycling ambassadors for The Netherlands.

Your combined blogs, photography and films have really opened my eyes to the world of the bicycle as a transport tool. I was blind before; or at least blinkered...

Maybe you can visit this colony and teach our politicians & bureaucrats a thing or two!

Regards,

Paul Martin
Brisbane, Australia

Severin said...

Wow, Hembrow AND Mark in the same place at the same time?! Too much good stuff! Thank you!

lofidelitybicycleclub said...

Thanks David for the mention and jolly well done to The Cycling Embassy of The Netherlands! We will be following developments very closely here in the UK.

Obviously an Embassy for Great Britain would have to be more of a political beast to that of the Netherlands and Denmark. Both have the design standards and know-how that we desperately need to translate into a UK context. Fortunately, many people have come forward prepared to roll their sleeves up and do that allied to campaigning hard to see it implemented. The UK seems to have developed a collective amnesia as to how we got from A to B in the past, and that it could benefit society as a whole in the future.

The path for the UK is a long one, but with adoption of best practice from mainland Europe and the rest of the World, that path doesn't have to be so narrow, circuitous and make us dismount every mile.

All the very best

Jim Davis

Micheal Blue said...

A cycling embassy that would educate people and governments worldwide is an excellent idea. One of the most important things is proper communication. I think that when national and local governments would be presented with truthful and enlightening info about the benefits and costs of cycling and the supporting infrastructure, many would implement it. It is easy to come to false conclusions when there are incomplete answers.
Such an education by the cycling embassy needs to be full-hearted and fairly intense, otherwise it would be just a flicker of light in darkness. BTW, Dave, that mini-bike in the video is your (cheaper) folder? It looks very good. I have a soft spot for folders, having one myself (but with 20" wheels). With those tiny wheels you must get a rough ride, no?

Micheal Blue said...

Having to drive my car today, it was striking how inefficient these machines are space-wise, and also energy wise. Most cars carry one or two people, yet have such a huge footprint. As to the energy efficiency, Wikipedia says car engines have efficiency between 20 - 40%. Bicycles have efficiency between 85 - 99%. Oh, well... I hope there are nice bike paths in heaven, otherwise I'll have a word or two with God (actually that would be the second word - the first one will be about the almost-constant westerly winds in Toronto).

r s thompson said...

"It is a way of life that gives the Dutch more quiet and more pleasant livable cities, ..."

i expect there are plenty of livable and growing cities with cars abound and few bicycles.

from my own point of view however, the dutch plan of intersection priority and secure bicycle infrastruture appears to sqeulch some car traffic in favor of bicycles.
i can see where the potential for car accidents (higher speed and often fatal) is reduced and the quiet-ness aspect could be a plus in some communities with greater bicycle travel. though many neighborhoods in the us are kindof cordoned off from thru traffic from major roads.

but as a commuting solution to broad car congested communities enhanced bicycle infrastructure could be a viable solution...3 to 5 times faster than walking, equippable for light cargo and healthy too.

kfg said...

Micheal - That figure is for the efficiency of the engine, not the car. It doesn't include things like drive train losses.

On the other hand, that figure for the efficiency of the bicycle is for the drive train losses and does not include the engine.

That would be you.

Micheal Blue said...

@ kfg, of course that's true. However, that's a slight technicality conveniently ignored by someone trying to prove his point. Well, drive train losses for a car with a manual transmission would be fairly negligible. What's the efficiency of a human body? It probably depends on the state of health of the body.
Hey, feed me a handful of nuts and a glass of good quality vegetable juice, and I'll happily bike those 20 km from work to my home. Stuff those into a gas tank of a car, and the car mechanic will happily replace your fuel system. While it's true that if I drank a glass of petrol, I'd get to a hospital faster in an ambulance than on a bike, the ambulance would take at least 2 liters of petrol for that 20-km hospital ride. Thus, while cars are faster and in some situations much more practical, they are at least five times less efficient than cars (a smaller car would be more fuel efficient than an ambulance). There you have the proof, kfg. No more scientific replies :-)

kfg said...

"Well, drive train losses for a car with a manual transmission would be fairly negligible."

Actually, they're quite substantial. That's one of the reasons we don't use shaft drive on bicycles (although people will keep trying for some reason). Even racing cars actually slowed down a bit when they switched from chain to shaft drive (they did it to promote sales of the manufacturers shaft drive street cars).

"What's the efficiency of a human body? It probably depends on the state of health of the body."

It depends more on whether it's asleep or awake. That's why the bicycle conquered the horse for transport purposes.

"conveniently ignored by someone trying to prove his point."

What was my point?

Micheal Blue said...

Eh, kfg I was trying to say that your post was correct and that I conveniently ignored those technical facts to prove my point. I was making fun of my previous comments. Regarding the shaft-driven bikes, it would be interesting to see the practical difference (vs. chain bikes). Biomega makes some beautiful shaft-driven bikes. There is also a manufacturer in the U.S. (Dynamic, I think). A little power loss might be worth it if there is no maintenance and if they are reliable (are they?). Of course, if the power loss is substantial, it wouldn't be worth it. I know the Dutch workhorse bikes have fully enclosed chains, but even those have to be eventually maintained, and from the little I've heard it's a pain in the butt to dis/re -assemble the chain cover. BTW, Dave, how often do you have to replace the chain on the Mango?

David Hembrow said...

Michael, the shaft drive bicycles I've tried have felt quite obviously inefficient and as a result been a bit nasty to ride. The only gear option is a hub, which is also less efficient than a derailleur with a chain.

The human body doesn't have masses spare energy available, so I think it's rather silly to make a bike inefficient. These are most likely to be bought by relatively inexperienced riders who have less energy to waste, which makes it even more tragic.

Chain cases aren't really that much of a pain. I replaced both my children's chains (within chain cases) a couple of weeks ago, and it only took a few minutes per bike. You only have to take the bottom half off to do this, which means removing two screws.

Mango chains can last a very long time. Sometimes over 40000 km. However, I didn't initially oil mine quite enough and it's looking a little worse for wear after 'only' 11000 km. I'm planning to replace it soon.

kfg said...

Michael - "I was making fun of my previous comments."

Oh, well, that's different. Never mind. :) I've been known to take the piss out of myself in similar manner when the situation warrants it; as it does all too often.

". . .if they are reliable (are they?)."

No, and they can't really be made reliable. A car makes power with low torque per stroke and rpm measured by the thousands.
A bicycle makes power with high torque and rpm measured by the tens. It is counterintuitive for most, but the transfer gears on a bicycle would have to be huge to take the loads properly.

A chaincase may seem like a pain to take off, but not half so much a pain as a torque tube and if well oiled before being sealed a chain actually lasts longer than the transfer gears on production bikes.

What the manufacturers know though is that these bikes are bought by people who will ride them a few times and then put them in the garage to be sold in 20 years. They're basically ripping people off with an illusion and they do it about every - 20 years; to erase cultural memory of the things. They always announce it as a new breakthrough, but the drive is always the same more than a century old design.

neil said...

Aghh, almost got sidetracked into shaft drive - but glad to be educated by kfg. They do look nice...

Hopefully a Dutch Cycling Embassy can help other countries understand how a Dutch cycle system can be achieved. It would be good.